|
|
| PSTS Bulletins |
| |
|
9th July 2010 - Don’t forgo the right to future pension scheme surpluses
|
‘Pah’, I hear you say as you snort at the prospect of there ever being a surplus in your company pension scheme. Well yes, it might seem that ever having a pension scheme surplus is a very remote prospect at the moment, but that does not mean to say that it will not happen. In actual fact, one might argue that it is highly likely that the vast majority of pension schemes will return to surplus in the future given long enough.
Read more -->
|
| |
|
5th July 2010 - Arrival of the first contribution notice
|
The Pensions Regulator’s Determination Panel – a committee of the Pensions Regulator with separately appointed members – published a determination on the 29th June 2010 to issue a £5.1 million contribution notice in relation to the Bonas Group Pension Scheme (the “Scheme”).
Read more -->
|
| |
|
9th June 2010 - Visteon – Not always easy to be reasonable
|
Many in the pensions industry thought that the US$550 million claim by the Visteon UK Pension Plan and the Pension Protection Fund was setting the scene for the next financial support direction or contribution notice by the Pensions Regulator. Those who were getting excited about the prospect of witnessing the Pensions Regulator exercising its “moral hazard” powers for the second time were certainly disappointed upon learning that the claim
was withdrawn.
Read more -->
|
| |
|
1st March 2008 - Section 75 Changes Confirmed
|
When an employer ceases to participate in a multiemployer defined benefit pension scheme a debt on the exiting employer (known as a Section 75 debt) is triggered. The debt is effectively the exiting employer’s share of the buyout deficit. This can, however, include a share of debt that truly belongs to employers no longer associated with the scheme in question, so called "orphan debt".
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
1st February 2008 - Regulator Imposes First FSD
|
Early February saw the Pensions Regulator formally impose its first Financial Support Directions ("FSDs") almost three years after coming into existence. The FSDs were originally issued to Sea Containers Limited in respect of two pension schemes of its subsidiary, Sea Containers Services Limited, back in June 2007 and earlier this year SCL withdrew its appeal against them.
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
1st February 2008 - Balance Sheet Bombshell?
|
"Explosive" and "bombshell" are words used in the financial press to describe the changes mooted by the Accounting Standards Board ("ASB") as it issued its discussion paper concerning the reform of defined benefit accounting disclosures. Some have estimated that this could increase defined benefit scheme liabilities on FTSE 100 balance sheets by up to £90 billion, as assumptions used to account for pension scheme liabilities move more into line with those used by bulk-annuity providers.
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
10th September 2007 - Proposed Revisions to the Pensions Regulator’s Clearance Guidance
|
On 10th September the Pensions Regulator issued a consultation document on proposed revisions to its existing guidance on clearance statements. The initial guidance was intended to give clarity on the approach the Regulator would take towards the clearance process and explain in more detail how the process would operate in practice. The revisions follow on from the Regulator’s comments earlier in the year that clearance should be considered when there was a significant weakening of the employer’s covenant regardless of the funding level of the pension scheme.
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
7th August 2007 - Proposed Changes to the Employer Debt Regulations
|
On 7th August 2007 the Department for Work and Pensions (the “DWP”) issued its consultation document on draft amendments to the Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt) Regulations 2005. These regulations are commonly known as the "Employer Debt Regulations" and arise from Section 75 of the Pensions Act 1995 which places a debt on the employer where an employer withdraws from a pension scheme.
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
1st May 2007 - Sting in the Tail for DC Schemes?
|
In recent years a significant number of companies have switched from defined benefit to defined contribution pension provision in order to reduce their pension risks and reduce costs. However, there may be a potential unfunded contingent liability being stored up for these companies that has not yet come within the corporate radar.
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
1st May 2007 - Pensions Regulator Clearance
|
What is clearance?
Clearance is a process whereby a company provides compensation for the weakening in their covenant towards their pension scheme that makes the payment of pension benefits in full less likely. This is usually as a result of a corporate transaction, for example where a highly leveraged transaction occurs and/or the assets to which the scheme currently has recourse are being removed from the employer group. It is a voluntary process for companies considering corporate transactions, and Trustees cannot force a company to go for clearance if they do not wish to do so. Clearance is not an approval of a transaction as such, but an assurance that the Regulator will not use its moral hazard powers against the company in relation to that transaction.
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
1st January 2007 - Solvency II & Occupational Pension Schemes
|
Solvency II is the European Commission’s new review of the regulatory capital regime of the insurance industry which is intended to replace the current requirements set out under Solvency I. Implementation is not expected before 2010, however, advanced discussions have taken place and it is expected that a formal framework directive will be published in the summer of 2007.
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
1st January 2007 - Beware the Accidental Pension Debt on the Employer
|
Businesses often have complex corporate structures where employees of multiple group companies may participate as members of a group wide defined benefit pension scheme. Should one of those companies stop having any employees as members in the pension scheme, the consequence can be significant, resulting in an unexpected and legally enforceable cash call on that employer from the Trustees of the pension scheme.
Read more -->
Synopsis -->
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|